Are you buying or selling property?
We can help — contact our NZ property law expert, Fiona Taylor today to set up an appointment.
11 March, 2015 | Fiona Taylor
To avoid any confusion and potential disputes (which can be lengthy and costly for all parties involved), it is best practice to list any items which are included or specifically excluded in the sale in the chattels section of the sale and purchase agreement. Why not take your vendor through the property before drafting the agreement – ask them which items they will be taking with them. And the purchaser before signing – ask them to point out items which they expect to be there on settlement?
In our experience, items that are in some way attached to the house (for example by screws, hooks, hanging off hooks, etc) cause the most problems.
If there is a dispute about whether an item is a fixture or a chattel, the starting point, at law, is to consider:
1.1. The degree of annexation (how is it attached to the house?); and
1.2. The purpose of the annexation (what purpose is the item serving? – note it is not a question of why the item was attached to the house).
When looking at these two points, it is helpful to step back and ask yourself whether a reasonable person would expect the item to be sold with the house?
When disputes arise, it is always a “he said she said” scenario with the agent being somewhere in the middle – “you told me the lampshade was included”, “I told you I was taking the dishwasher”, “it’s a fixture, that’s how it was marketed”, “it wasn’t in the agreement”. The one certainty is that there will be costs involved (legal costs, replacement costs, time spent, etc) for someone, sometimes everyone.
2 November, 2011 | Fiona Taylor
14 September, 2016 | Fiona Taylor